The POTUS and His Vinyl Close Up

POTUSAlbum covers, since their inception, have always been a great sign-post of the climate of our times.  Their images are visual cues that direct everyone from the culturally focused individual to the political astute citizen to the casual music listening fan toward the current grand social narrative of the day.  Savvy musical artists in cahoots with photographers and visual artists (in this new era of entertainment it is most likely the director of artist branding) design their album covers to attract and stimulate interest in their content.  Some of these efforts have been regrettable and forgettable, while others have been remarkably memorable and remain culturally relevant decade after decade.

So, what kind of visual cues are being made about the grand current social narrative when dime-a-dozen digital artists place the POTUS,  Barack Obama, on the cover of iconic album covers?  Does Obama’s presidency serve as the musical content in which the dime-a-dozen digital artist is trying to attract and stimulate the culturally focused individual and the casual political fan?  Either way, the following album covers containing the image of the POTUS are indeed memorable and culturally relevant . . . at the moment.  And if anything, are too cool to be regrettable.

[Try to make out some of the original album covers and artists]

1 1A 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Scandal: I Know Why Bey Lip-Synched!

Beyonce Lip SynchingOk, it’s been over a week since Beyonce sang the Star Spangled Banner on the Capital steps in celebration of the historical second inauguration of President Barack Obama.  The following day of the event it was revealed that she lip-synched her performance on such a momentous occasion, which set off a firestorm of commentary and opinions that ranged from it being the best performance of her life to so what!  Well, the following is my commentary and opinion of her performance and most likely not the last public discharge on the happening before Beyonce’s next performance: the Superbowl Halftime Show.

So what is it that I have to say that has not already been said?  Well I hope to put into context the reason Beyonce decided to lip sync the tune and the reason we were all talking about it.

First let me say that to me her performance was not surprising.  During her live performance, I thought it was just good.  It wasn’t spectacular or all that! Just good. I’ve heard better. The next day, when I heard she might have lip-synched her performance I thought, “Ok, I’m not surprised.”  Please understand the Star Spangled Banner is a relatively easy song to sing.  I can sing it (albeit it may not be pleasing to your ears).  Its melody, which has it’s origins in an 1800 century English social club was composed no doubt while inebriated, is catchy and memorable which is why you can hum along when you forget Francis Scott Key’s words, which he scribed almost a century later.  Although it is an easy song to sing, what makes its performance special lies in the ability of the singer.  Here is the reason why shower singers or alone-in-the-car singers like me will never be asked to sing the song in public.  The song’s simple melody provides plenty of space for the gifted singer to seemingly perform vocal miracles at will.  Not many can do this.  Able gifted singers are free to explore the boundaries of their gift with this song. The ability to perform at this level is what makes it an amazing anthem and exciting to listen to, especially when sung by someone who is indeed capable.  Enter Bey.

Let me be clear here, I’m not hating on her, she is simply neither capable nor gifted enough to perform the song in a spectacular manner.  And for that matter a lot of folks are not either.  Bey’s vocal prowess is limited.  She lacks the range and power needed to create a memorable performance.  A few articles, penned in her defense last week, announced she was one of the greatest singers of all time.  Ha, this is laughable.  Her mentors are still around, right?  She possesses nowhere near the vocal talent of Patti, Chaka, Gladys, Anita, and certainly not Aretha.  These truly gifted singers at Bey’s age were unrivaled in their talent.  Bey, to no fault of her own, does not have what it takes in terms of her physical voice to match any performance of her mentors.

Aretha at 30 around Bey's age.

Aretha at around Bey’s age, 30.

Even in comparison to her contemporaries such as Ledisi, Jennifer Hudson, Alicia Keys and I’ll throw in the untouchable and seasoned Rachelle Ferrell just to f**k with the curve, she falls extremely short of the mark.

What Bey did was not unprecedented. That day the choir, not the soloist, lip-synched to a prerecorded track.  Also in 2009, the cellist Yo-Yo Ma and the violinist Itzhak Perlman “string-synched” their performance because string instruments are notoriously temperamental in cold weather.  They did this because they had no physical control over their instrument . . . like Bey.

Ok knowing this about her lack of ability, it’s great she did in fact lip sync her performance.  Can you imagine what it might have sounded like?

So, why was this a scandal if others have in essence faked their performance as well?  It’s the expectation created by the event.  We the people expect the best when it comes to such events like the Presidential inauguration.  For decades the best and most significant/impact-ful singers, poets, writers, and politicians were gathered together to help set the tone of the up coming Presidency.  With this type of talent we the people expect the best.  Bey’s lip synching performance was not the best for the American people.  Of course her fans beg to differ or simply shrug it off and say, “so!”  Along with the fact that most Americans hold high expectations of all portions of the inauguration we also expected the best from Bey, which would have been a live, sincere, and authentic performance.  However, when it comes to the singing talent of Bey, I feel most of the world has been duped into believing what she is not.  I believe we have confused her ability to entertain with the ability to sing.  These are two very different things.  Let’s not get it twisted, Bey is not a singer and never has been a singer.  As mentioned, she is not physically capable of sangin’.  What I mean by this is I doubt she can belt out any tune in my living room sans a mic with enough power, conviction, skill, or emotion to move me.  Please realize this, I refer to my vocal luminaries to guide me in the direction of a person who is truly gifted in voice. [a few of my vocal luminaries in terms of women are of course Patti, Chaka, Aretha, Rachelle, but also Ella Fitzgerald, Billie Holiday, Sarah Vaughan, Mahalia Jackson, Whitney Houston, and again Jennifer Hudson . . .] I recognize and embrace those singers who match my vocal luminaries and move me.  I will never embrace anyone who falls short of this high bar as a singer.  Why would I accept anything less or mediocre?  Bey can indeed hold a tune, but so can many others.  Bey is mediocre.  Rather than a singer I define her as an extremely successful entertainer.  She possesses many abilities to entertain her fans and even me.  An entertainer does it all to appeal to a mass audience.  She can hold a tune, dance, and act.  Bey is an entertainer! I like entertainers; I like being entertained.  Ben Vereen and Sammy Davis, Jr. were entertainers who were also in the top ten of the list in all those categories that define an entertainer.  They could sing, dance, and act on a high level.

Davis acting his ass off in the film "A Man Called Adam"

Davis acting his ass off in the film “A Man Called Adam” click here

Unlike Vereen and Davis, I believe Bey being mediocre in all of these is still able to dupe the American public into thinking she is a singer on a high level.  She is not the best singer, she is not the best dancer, and she is not the best actor by any stretch of the imagination.  Today’s entertainer does it all and is categorized wrongly as a singer.  And it is because of this wrongly placed moniker Bey, an entertainer, was chosen and expected to do the work of a singer at the Presidential inauguration.  I believe this was made a scandal because we expected Bey to be that amazing singer and she failed us.

Furthermore, I believe Bey knows she can’t sing on that level.  According to all the reports and articles, Bey at the last minute decided to lip sync her performance.  Why?  Was she nervous? Did she forget the words?  I think not! She has sung the Star Spangled Banner many times before both live and lip-synched.  I believe she did not feel capable of creating a memorable performance with her knowingly limited skill.  I can imagine her saying to H.O.V.A., “I know I’m not going to be able to sing anything better than what I did in the studio yesterday not to mention I have not practiced with the Marine Band.”  She lacked the ability and with this lacked the confidence to even try.  In so many words she had no guts, no courage, no gumption . . . in essence no Balls!  This is completely expected when you don’t believe in your own talent.  Bey demonstrated pure fear.  Any stellar singer worth anything would have marched out on the steps of the Capital and did the damn thang!  Four years ago Aretha Franklin sang her ass off in colder weather and very little warm up time.  In an interview about her spectacular performance she commented that she wished she had more time to warm up because her performance would have been better . . .  Balls!  Oh and she also commented she wanted to give this historical occasion an atmosphere of authenticity.  However when you are unsure of you own instrument or lack the ability you will fold like a wet noodle.  Luckily Bey recorded a stand in the day before and tagged out of the task.

With all this being said I feel Bey’s credibility, as a singer is unchanged in my mind. I didn’t expect her to do anything more.  Hell, if anything it should have been better, after all, she recorded in near perfect conditions in a studio the day before.  In the end, I hope you can understand the context of Bey’s performance or lack there of.  She is a physically limited singer, which she is fully aware of who lacks the self-confidence to perform on the grandest of stages all while an audience who has been duped into believing she is a singer who can create something amazing!

Oh, the scandal!

This coming Sunday when you are watching the Superbowl Halftime Show remember you are watching an entertainer and not a singer, so don’t expect to be amazed much by her vocal performance.  However you will be greatly entertained.

Ndegeocello Sings Simone!

Me'Shell NdegeocelloI confess I’ve been a fan of bassist/singer/songwriter Meshell Ndegeocello since she dropped her first album Plantation Lullabies in the early 90s.  I’ve watched her perform in L.A. several times and once in Atlanta in 2007, which was memorable I must say.  However, even more memorable than that was when I saw her years earlier live at the Virgin Mega store in Hollywood.  Ndegeocello played a small in-store set then signed copies of her second released Peace Beyond Passion (96).  I clearly remember asking her, as she signed the cover of my freshly bought CD, “Where’d you get that funk from?” like the P-Funk lyric.  She smiled and said, “Yes, right there!”  Wow! I just had a brief moment with Meshell Ndegeocello, whoa!

Over the years I’ve enjoyed the limitless range of Ndegeocello’s music.  As a serious soul music lover, I’ve especially relished in her exploration of the many nuances of soul. Ndegeocello and her music easily moved beyond the essentialist theory of the black artist.  She approached several other genres of music in her own unique way.

So, when I heard she was in the process of recording an album of Nina Simone songs I was excitedly perplexed (this is a good thing).  What would it sound like? Would it be funky with heavy bass lines? Or would the songs be reconfigured in emotion filled ballads with spoken word-like delivery? (You know how she does).

Nina Simone and Meshell Ndegeocello, on the one hand, are quite unique in their own right who together share some similarities.  Scholar Salamishah Tillet suggests, “Ndegeocello, like Simone, has dared to cross musical boundaries, express bold politics and be a steadfast presence as an African American woman instrumentalist in a male-dominated music scene.”  Also their similarities continue in terms of their fitting into socially comfortable places in America.  On the other hand, they are opposites in terms of the musical RESPONSE to their perspective eras; Simone confronted racial inequality amid social and civil unrest while Ndegeocello struggled in a post civil rights climate with her personal sexuality within rigid cultural mores.  A struggle afforded her by the work of Simone, in all seriousness.

Ndegeocello’s new album, Pour Une Âme Souveraine (For A Sovereign Soul) was released in October and is a wonderfully crafted tribute to Simone.  Pour Une Ame SouveraineFirst and foremost, Ndegeocello’s voice is perfect for the songs she sings while her musical approach is spot on.  She organically moves away–though not far–from the musical intention of Simone certainly due to the contemporary climate of the times. Ndegeocello finds a laid back groove for each song that departs from what NPR calls the “urgent” tone of Simone.  Her small group of musicians recorded the album with an obvious audible post soul aesthetic that is undeniably Ndegeocello.  She invited vocalist/musicians such as Cody ChesnuTT, Toshi Reagon, Sinead O’Connor, and Lizz Wright to join her on this tribute to Simone.  Collectively they sing with heartfelt respect for Simone whom Ndegeocello calls “royalty.”

This tribute album is a way to remember the indescribable force that was Nina Simone. Ndegeocello stated in a recent interview she hopes, “to get more people interested in her, check out her catalog and sort of revive it, and also use her story and learn from her story.”  After hearing the album it is clear to me that Ndegeocello was the perfect person to put forth this stellar tribute. Yes, Ndegeocello sings Simone!  In the end, I have to agree with Dr. Tillet when she suggests, Ndegeocello “has always been Simone’s heir apparent.

Your Sunday iPod add: Michael Kiwanuka: Raw Soul Folk

Here is your Sunday iPod add . . . any song form Michael Kiwanuka’s debut album Home Again.  For months now I have seen Kiwanuka’s face on the sidebar of my facebook page staring at me suggesting I should click on his image to hear his new music.  I’ve also seen his image on the bottom of my iTunes in a star-studded line up of what other listeners bought.  For months I have pass over his image and move on the next artist that caught my interest.

Well, today, after church and my daughter’s long rehearsal for a play, I headed home and I logged on.  There he was Michael Kiwanuka staring at me.  While eating my corndog I clicked on his image.  Wow! What took me so long to do this? What was I waiting for? Kiwanuka’s music combined the essential elements of acoustic soul and folk in the best way.  My musical taste are admittedly broad so, I listen to just about anything (I merely talk about the soul I listen to on this blog) and it’s been a quite along time since I’ve listen to some good contemporary acoustic folk music, rather, acoustic soul folk music.

I listened to a few of his songs and videos on youtube with amazement.  Kiwanuka, a 25 year old Brit with roots in Uganda has manage to capture a unique musical rawness of a generation and a half ago.  A recent USA Today article described his music as “warm and familiar as Sunday morning” and make sensible vocal comparisons to “Otis Redding” and “Bill Withers.”  However, I’ll take it a step further and easily compare him to the likes of badass guitar slingers and song poets such as Neil Young, Jimi Hendrix, Bob Dylan, and Richie Havens without reservation. He’s that good! His music is soulful and righteously folk yet contain just enough blues to elicit a mystical wonder that conjures images of deals being made at a Mississippi crossroads.

Listen to Michael Kiwanuka! Don’t sleep on MK! Don’t be like me and pass on him.

Add his album to your iPod and you will thank me later.

Check his videos below:

You gotta check out his version of Hendrix’s “Waterfall”

Your Sunday iPod Add: (You Caught Me) Smiling!

Everyone loves a great sincere smile.  A smile is a simple action that is free; it cost nothing to give or receive.

Someone once said this about a smile:

If you have only one smile in you, give it to the people you love. Don’t be surly at home, then go out in the street and start grinning ‘Good morning’ at total strangers.

Maya Angelou

But you’re so busy changing the world; just one smile can change all of mine.

Jack Johnson

Children show me in their playful smiles the divine in everyone.

Michael Jackson

Peace begins with a smile . . .

Mother Teresa

You caught me smiling, again!

Sly and The Family Stone

Here is your Sunday iPod add. Enjoy . . . and smile! You’ll thank me later.

Your Sunday iPod Add: Funkin’ For Fun

Ok, I had something else cued up for this Sunday’s iPod add, but when I heard “Funkin’ For Fun” earlier today I had to pass it along.  This is one of my favorite songs off Parliament’s The Clones of Dr. Funkenstein(1976) album.  What makes this song so special to me are the vocals of Glen Goins.

Glen Goins and George Clinton circa 1976-77

He has the most powerful soulful gospel vocals I’ve ever heard.  He is featured on the entire album along with Garry Shider and together they are amazing (you ain’t heard nothing like it).  Goins guttural crescendos, screams, and hollers do it for me.  Goins voice easily creates a space, which hovers just outside the realm early turn of the century gospel music.  If you changed the lyrics, which give assurances to ones mother that everything is all right, the song might as well be a gospel song.  However, this song is not gospel it is full fledge Funk!  Sadly, Goins passed away in 1978 from Hodgkins Lymphoma at the age of 24. (RIP)

Anyway add this song to your iPod and you will thank me later.

Below is a live version of the song, however for a better experience of the song I suggest you take listen to the album version for more detail of Glen’s voice and the perfectly place version of the Beatles’ lyric “coo coo ca choo!”

Your Sunday iPod Add: Rachelle Ferrell

Here is your Sunday iPod add.  Identified as a singer’s singer, Rachelle Farrell easily stands a top the small community of those truly gifted to sing.  Her GOD given vocal talent is revered by both veterans and up and coming singers who strive to hone their gift. The incomparable Anita Baker recently stated, “Rachelle Ferrell . . . is who we all want to be when we grow up.”  Rachelle is that rare talent that only comes around every once in a while.  Her voice, of seemingly endless amount octaves, can easily create a sonic tapestry that warms the soul.  Rachelle is one of a few artists that have mastered multiple genres of music such as jazz, blues, gospel, and R&B.  She is known for her ability to re-imagine and perform songs in her own unique way.  Rachelle is pitch-perfect in her endeavors and does not disappoint.  She is indeed a treasured commodity.  Take a moment to listen to this amazing vocalist then add her to your iPod.  You will thank me later.

And

RUN-DMC’S ROCK BOX, RUN’S VERSE: AN EXAMINATION OF TRUTHINES

Last month I had the opportunity to read an article on the Huffington Post site about Jay Z’s 2004 hit “99 Problems.”  The article discussed a well overdue paper written by associate law professor Caleb Mason, Ph.D. at Southwestern Law School, titled JAY-Z’S 99 PROBLEMS, VERSE 2: A CLOSE READING WITH FOURTH AMENDMENT GUIDANCE FOR COPS AND PERPS.  His paper explored the truthiness (thanks Colbert) of H.O.V.A.’s 2nd verse.  I followed the link from the article to get a glimpse of the paper.  I perused most of the paper and it was damn good.  Dr. Mason went line by line to set the legal record straight on J’s rap.

Forthrightly, I am fascinated by lyric analysis.  The meaning of lyrics in a given context can yield numerous results.  For example, lyrics in a cultural context are vast and often times hinge on the biases of the interpreter and certainly the era (decade of interpretation), and goal of the analysis.  In some cases, lyric meanings, minus the input from the author/artist, can be endless because the song’s connotation is left to the listener, reader, and interpreter.  Some examples of this would be Eric Burdon and War’s 1970 hit “Spill The Wine,” or any one of Parliament/Funkadelic or James Brown’s joints and even The Beatles’ “I am The Walrus”–wait, scratch that–we all know there is only one meaning to that song . . . Anyway these songs can easily have multiple meanings and no doubt make meaningful contributions and commentary in political, cultural, and social spheres.

After reading the Huffington Post article, I began thinking about analyzing songs.  Ultimately, I was inspired to analyze the lyrics of a hip-hop song to see what I’d come up with–albeit not as thorough as Dr. Mason’s piece . . . this is just a blog you know!

In 2004, hip-hop had long since solidified itself as a more than viable musical genre.  Hip-hop in the millennium has matured and has earned the right to stay out late.  Now it often comments on social events, cultural phenomena, political topics, and can easily facilitate a global conversation.

Hip-Hop’s first shoe.

Yep, it’s all grown up!  Analysis of today’s hip-hop is amazing in terms of the converging cultures and musical genres.  But what about an analysis of hip-hop when it was young and didn’t know any better?  What about when it was still learning how to walk in those white patent leather baby shoes while sucking it’s thumb?  Or when it was trying to figure out which way It was going to swing to get it’s future swag just right?  What about that?

So, I thought it would be interesting to look at a hip-hop song that preceded Jay’s by twenty years to examine its truthinessI decided to analyze rap pioneers Run-DMC’s hit “Rock Box.”  It was the top rap song in 1984.  The popular “Rock Box” was the 3rd single released off their début album.  This song was boisterous, outlandish, gritty, and contained elements of rock through Eddie Martinez’s guitar riffs and solo.  Run-DMC caused a ruckus and their lyrics boasted in pure self-aggrandizement.  So I posed the question (to myself), did they have grounds to make such statements?  Were they actually better than their contemporaries such as Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five, Kurtis Blow, The Fat Boys, and WhodiniWell, let’s see if their statements were true in the context of their time.  I will be looking at Run’s first verse only.

For all you sucker MC’s perpetratin’ a fraud

This has got to be one of the baddest (not bad as in bad but bad meaning good) intro lines in a rap song . . . ever!  Run is letting it be know that this song is for non-original, unskilled, and lyrically deficient rappers.  He cuts directly to the core of the mindset of a rapper–“I am the best to ever hold a microphone!”  Lyrical lines like these came straight from the rap battles of the day, which where intended to emasculate, humble, and debase the legitimacy of the opposing rapper.  Run was cold with this!  But wait hold up a minute!  How can he say this?  He may not be an unskilled rapper but he and partner D.M.C. may have compromised their originality on their second single release by re-recording Kurtis Blow’s 1980’s song titled “Hard Times.”  Run-DMC’s song contains the same subject matter and certainly some of the same lyrics.  I know this may have been a nod to their idol Kurtis Blow and an ode to the climate of the times, but they could have been original about it.  So who’s the sucker MC now? (They also re-made Aerosmith’s “Walk This Way,” but since it was technically a duet they get a pass).

Your rhymes are cold wack and keep the crowd cold lost

Wack?!!!  Hmmm . . . of the top ranking rap song of the era such as U.T.F.O’s “Roxanne Roxanne,” Whodini’s “The Freaks Come Out At Night,” Kurtis Blow’s “8 Million Stories,” and Newcleus’ “Jam On It” the latter is the only one that may have qualified as having “cold wack” rhymes (sorry Newcleus fans).  A certified club hit, yet note their lyrics: “Do we get to say wikki wikki wikki again?”  They continue and say something about “Burger King and a sack of Big Macs . . .” as well as a narrative about a rap battle with Superman.  With these lyrics they certainly entered the realm of wack-ness!

You’re the kind of guy that girl ignored

Well this is obvious, right?  Run’s lyrics were so tough, he could not be ignored by anyone especially the women.  In fact, at 19 his rhymes were so alluring he attracted and married Valerie Vaughn a year before “Rock Box” was released.  Run was not ignored for the next 13 years.

I’m drivin’ a ‘Caddy,’ you fixin’ a Ford

I don’t have any evidence that Run drove a ‘Caddy’ (Cadillac).  However, culturally speaking, it’s no secret African Americans have long since had a love affair with the ‘Caddy.’  The Cadillac is a symbol of success in urban America.  From pimps to preachers it was the vehicle of choice.  If Run was indeed rollin’ a ‘Caddy’ I imagine it was a pimp out Seville fully loaded with all the trimmings.  Meanwhile, if Run’s competition own a Ford they were sho’ nuff fixin’ it.  In the 70s and 80s Ford earned a tragic reputation of poor craftsmanship and unreliability that led to some of the funniest acronyms for an entire car company.  Check these out: Found On Repairman’s Doorstep; Found On Rack Daily; Ford Owners Recommend Dodge; Full Of Rust Deposits; F**ker Only Rolls Downhill; Fix Or Repair Daily; Found On Road Dead; Frequently Overhauled, Rarely Driven; and FORD backwards: Driver Returns On Foot . . . Damn! That ain’t right!

My name is Joseph Simmons but my middle name’s Ward

and when I’m rockin’ on the mic, you should all applaud

Because we’re (wheelin’, dealin’, we got a funny feelin’)

We rock from the floor up to the ceilin’

Indeed his mama did give him the middle name Ward.  According to Babynames.com, Ward means ‘guardian’ and was most popular in 1961 (Run was born in 1964).  In 1984 Run was certainly able to guard the mic and reign supreme.  I only wish today he were able to guard and preserve Rap’s authentic integrity it once had.

Rev. Run in full effect!

Furthermore, Run’s lyrics contain an air of veracity and with this “Rock Box” ventured into uncharted territory.  The song peaked at #26 on the Hot Dance Club chart making it the first rap song to make that chart.  The group’s self-produced video for “Rock Box” was the first rap video to air on MTV and it help catapult Run-DMC’s first album to gold status (500,000 sold) and get them nominated for a Grammy . . . Yes, we should all applaud.

We groove it (you move it) it has been proven

We calmed the seven seas because our music is soothin’

No doubt, when you dropped the needle (yes, the needle) the song made you take notice and move.  However, “soothin’” this song was not.  In fact, this song and the rest of Run-DMC’s songs were loud, hard hitting, and in your face in comparison to previous rap songs of the era.  The object was to get attention.  It did!

We create it (relate it) and often demonstrate it

Well, they did as a matter of fact, create their own sound and wrote their own rhymes, which related directly to the mid 80s youth culture.  They have been demonstrating “it” as early as 1983 by touring all across America sometimes with LL Cool J and the Beasties Boys in tow; whom had yet to drop a recording at the time.

We’ll diss a sucker MC make the other suckers hate it

They constantly made claims they were the best in the rap game.  Their rhymes were designed to get a rise out of any M.C. who thought they were worthy of the challenge.  I’m sure the dissed sucka M.C.’s that fell by the way side became consumed with jealousy and even hatred as Run-DMC climbed the charts.  Their flow and success was too much for the sucka M.C.

We’re risin’ (surprisin’) and often hypnotizing

Risin’ and hypnotizing?  Well, yeah . . . Their status elevated in the burgeoning hip-hop genre so quickly that they were invited in 1985 to perform at the first Live Aid concert based on the success of “Rock Box.”  Live Aid was a global concert on two stages; one on the Wembley Stadium stage in London, England and the second on the J.F.K. Stadium stage in Philadelphia, which were connected through live video feed to raise money for the Ethiopian famine.  Run-DMC performed on the Philly stage with the likes of Joan Baez, Black Sabbath, Crosby, Stills, and Nash, Santana, and Madonna.  On live video feed from Wembley they shared the stage with The Who, David Bowie, U2, Sade, and Paul McCartney.  The group continued to rise, which was indeed surprisingly hypnotizing!

We always tell the truth and then we never slip no lies in

Well a few lies here and there, but what is hip-hop without a little mendacity.

No curls (no braids) peasy-head and still get paid

That’s right, my brothas never sported a greasy Jheri Curl (fingers crossed hoping no photo ever pops up with them looking greasy).  Their hair was short neat and nappy!  They did not have to conform to make money.  In less than a year after their first album Run-DMC would release another hit song titled “My Adidas,” which garnered them a $1.6 million endorsement deal with Adidas.  This now famously lucrative connection has allowed Adidas’ shoes and apparel to became tops in the hip-hop world–a legacy which continues today.

Jam Master cut the record up and down and cross-fade

Jason William Mizell, a.k.a. Jam Master J. dreamed up, created, and produced all the beats and music for “Rock Box.”  J’s style became the signature sound of Run-DMC and early hip-hop.  Sadly, the man who created the soundtrack to my “wonder years” was murdered on Oct. 30 2002.  Damn That DJ Made My Day!

So there you have it, my take on Run’s first verse of “Rock Box.”  You should take DMC’s verse next.  I hear he’s a rhyming apparatus!

Your Sunday iPod Add: Robin Thicke

Above is your Sunday iPod add. “Love After War” by Robin Thicke.  This is simply an awesome R&B track. Period. Thicke has written a song that sonically honors classic Motown and the writing efforts of Smokey Robinson.  Its relentless up-tempo groove and slick production make this track shine.  Thicke’s contemporaries, Tank, Tyrese, Joe, Carl Thomas, and Genuwine, who all have released albums in the past 10 months, have been put on notice to step up their R&B game.  Just a note: Eric Benét has elevated his game. I’ll blog about him on a later date.

Add “Love After War” to your iPod and you will thank me later.

José James: Your Sunday iPod Add

Returning with a vengeance, here is your new Sunday iPod add “Touch” by the extraordinary vocalist José James. “Touch” has become one of my favorite mid tempo jams to listen to.  The driving groove goes down smooth and easy.  Led by the drum and bass, this cut allows James to vocally float over chord changes with what some call a “romantic baritone” voice.  His voice is unique and defies comparison to other male vocalist on the scene today.  Admittedly inspired by the supreme John Coltrane, James’ music is rooted in Jazz and utilizes elements of Soul and Hip Hop, which displays a certain youthful exuberance to be admired.  If you were wondering where is that new vocalist who makes audience stand up and take notice, wonder no more.  José James is an artist you should know.  Add this song to your iPod as soon as possible.  You will thank me later.

Oh, and note to the romantics reading this: James’ songs are smoking hot!  Some soft light and a little wine can amp up an intimate moment . . . watch out dere now!